Introduction

In the fast-paced world of academia, a compelling research pitch—often dubbed the “elevator pitch”—is a critical tool for doctoral students. This concise, engaging summary of your work can unlock opportunities for collaborations, mentorship, funding, and career advancement. Whether you’re at a conference coffee break, an academic reception, or a chance hallway encounter, your pitch must captivate busy, influential scholars in mere minutes.

While the importance of a research pitch is widely acknowledged, detailed guidance on crafting and delivering one effectively is scarce. Drawing on insights from Varun Grover, Distinguished Professor of Information Systems at the University of Arkansas, this guide dissects the anatomy of a winning research pitch and offers practical, actionable strategies to make yours resonate with any audience.

Why Your Research Pitch Matters

A research pitch is more than a summary of your dissertation—it’s a chance to spark curiosity, convey significance, and establish yourself as a thoughtful scholar. Whether you’re:

• Responding to “What are you working on?” in a job interview,
• Introducing yourself to a potential collaborator, or
• Networking casually at a conference,

the quality of your pitch shapes the impression you leave. As Grover emphasizes, even groundbreaking research can fall flat if presented without clarity, enthusiasm, or a sense of its broader impact. A strong pitch positions you as a capable researcher and opens doors to professional opportunities.

The Three-Part Structure of a Research Pitch

Grover’s framework for a successful pitch consists of three interconnected components:

1. Preamble: Your motivation and research question.
2. The Hard Work: A concise overview of your theoretical and methodological approach.
3. Takeaways: The key findings or contributions.

Together, these elements form a cohesive narrative that flows from the problem you’re tackling, to the work you’ve done, to the insights you’ve uncovered.

1. The Preamble: Setting the Stage

Critical Success Factor: Convey why your topic matters—both personally and societally.

Many doctoral students start their pitch with dense, jargon-laden descriptions that fail to engage listeners. For example:

❌ “I’m studying network externalities in multi-platforming due to different risk profiles of e-retailers.”

This approach, while accurate, doesn’t invite curiosity or connection. Instead, frame your research question as a relatable, real-world problem:

✅ “Imagine you’re a small business owner selling products online. You could use Amazon for greater exposure, but you risk losing control over your marketing and face fierce competition. Should you spread your efforts across multiple platforms to reduce risk, or focus on one to build stronger customer relationships? My research helps e-retailers make this critical decision.”

Why this works:

• It places the listener in the perspective of the research subject, making it relatable.
• It highlights the problem’s urgency and relevance.
• It conveys your passion and purpose, drawing the audience in.

Pro Tip: Start with a vivid scenario or question that hooks the listener emotionally or intellectually. Avoid technical terms in the preamble unless they’re widely understood.

2. The Hard Work: Showing Depth Without Overwhelming

Critical Success Factor: Communicate the substance of your work clearly, without assuming the listener shares your expertise.

It’s tempting to overload your pitch with technical details to showcase rigor:

❌ “I used theories of risk diversification, network externalities, and complementarities to analyze e-retailer multi-platform behavior using finite mixture models on 2,000 cases.”

This risks alienating listeners unfamiliar with your field’s jargon. Instead, focus on your contribution’s novelty and approach in accessible terms:

✅ “Most studies on multi-platforming only look at user behavior. My work takes a broader view, examining both the risks and benefits for e-retailers, grounded in economic theories. I analyzed data from 2,000 e-retailers, combining public datasets and scraped platform data to test our model.”

Why this works:

• It positions your research as innovative by contrasting it with existing work.
• It conveys rigor without drowning the listener in technicalities.
• It uses clear language to make your methodology approachable.

Pro Tip: Highlight one or two key aspects of your approach (e.g., a unique theory, dataset, or method) and explain their value in simple terms.

3. Takeaways: Delivering the Payoff

Critical Success Factor: Highlight the most compelling and impactful findings, avoiding a generic list of results.

Resist the urge to catalog all your findings:

❌ “My results show that externalities, risk diversification, and complementary market segments matter, with significant moderation effects.”

Instead, select one or two findings that tie directly to your preamble and resonate with your audience:

✅ “We found that e-retailers with unique products benefit from using multiple platforms to reach diverse customers. However, if their products aren’t distinctive, focusing on a single platform builds stronger loyalty and saves resources.”

Why this works:

• It resolves the problem introduced in the preamble, creating a satisfying narrative arc.
• It makes your findings concrete and memorable.
• It piques curiosity, encouraging follow-up questions.

Pro Tip: Choose findings that are surprising, counterintuitive, or directly actionable to maximize impact.

Special Considerations and Variations

Multi-Essay Dissertations

For dissertations with multiple essays:

• Connected essays: Pitch the overarching research program, then briefly summarize each essay’s question, method, and takeaway (e.g., “My dissertation explores X through three essays: the first examines…, the second investigates…”).
• Unrelated essays: Focus on the most developed or impactful essay, clarifying that it’s one part of your broader work (e.g., “My dissertation includes several studies, but today I’ll focus on…”).

Different Stages of Research

• Early stage: Emphasize the preamble to generate excitement about your research question and motivation.
• Post-proposal: Combine the preamble and hard work to showcase your progress and approach.
• Completed project: Include all three components, with a strong focus on takeaways to highlight your contributions.

Different Audiences

• Job interviews: Tailor your pitch to align with the interviewer’s research or the department’s priorities (e.g., “My work on X complements your department’s focus on Y”).
• Informal networking: Use a shorter version (30–60 seconds), emphasizing the preamble and takeaway for quick impact.
• Expert audiences: Include slightly more technical detail in the hard work section, but still keep it concise and accessible.

Style and Delivery Tips

1. Tell a Story: Ensure the preamble, hard work, and takeaways flow logically, creating a narrative arc that’s easy to follow.
2. Practice, but Stay Natural: Rehearse your pitch to build confidence, but deliver it conversationally to avoid sounding robotic.
3. Show Enthusiasm: Your passion for your research is contagious—if you’re not excited, your audience won’t be either.
4. Adapt on the Fly: Be prepared to shorten your pitch (e.g., 30 seconds for casual chats) or expand it (e.g., 2 minutes for interviews) based on time and audience cues.
5. Invite Engagement: End with an open-ended statement or question (e.g., “I’d love to hear your thoughts on this approach”) to encourage dialogue.

Final Thoughts

A well-crafted research pitch is more than a summary—it’s a strategic tool to showcase your expertise and build professional connections. By framing your topic as a relatable problem, clearly articulating your unique contribution, and highlighting compelling insights, you can turn a brief interaction into a springboard for collaboration, mentorship, or career growth.

Think of your pitch not as a condensed academic abstract, but as a short, engaging story that conveys why your work matters—to you, your field, and the world. With practice and refinement, your pitch can leave a lasting impression, regardless of your audience’s expertise.

---

Bonus: Research Pitch Template

Below is a customizable template based on Grover’s framework to help you craft your own pitch:

Research Pitch Template for Doctoral Students

Use this template to craft a concise, engaging research pitch tailored to your work. Aim for 1–2 minutes in delivery, adjusting based on your audience and context.

Preamble: Why It Matters

• Start with a relatable scenario, question, or problem to hook your audience.
• Explain why this problem is important (societally, practically, or academically).
• Share your motivation to show your passion.
• Example: “Imagine [real-world scenario]. This is a challenge because [problem]. My research explores [research question] to address this issue.”

Your Preamble: [Your text here]

The Hard Work: Your Approach

• Highlight what makes your work unique (e.g., a new perspective, dataset, or method).
• Briefly describe your theoretical or methodological approach in accessible terms.
• Use contrasts to position your contribution (e.g., “Unlike most studies, which focus on X, my work examines Y”).
• Example: “While most research on [topic] focuses on [common approach], I take a different angle by [your approach]. Using [method/data], I investigate [specific aspect].”

Your Hard Work: [Your text here]

Takeaways: The Payoff

• Share 1–2 key findings or contributions that resolve or advance the problem from your preamble.
• Make them concrete, memorable, and relevant to your audience.
• Example: “My findings show [key insight], which means [impact]. This helps [audience/stakeholders] by [benefit].”

Your Takeaways: [Your text here]

Tips for Customization

• For early-stage research: Focus heavily on the preamble and lightly on the hard work, noting that findings are forthcoming.
• For multi-essay dissertations: Summarize the overarching theme, then pick one essay or briefly mention each.
• For interviews: Connect your work to the department’s or interviewer’s interests.
• For informal settings: Shorten to 30–60 seconds, emphasizing preamble and takeaways.